Ryan Nijboer vs Ignacio Parisca Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Ryan Nijboer has recently been winning 39.86% of second serve points, whereas Ignacio Parisca has been slightly more successful at 43.68%. Does this give Parisca an edge in service games? It seems likely.
• Nijboer's return game has a win rate of 47.10% against opponents’ second serves, while Parisca surpasses him slightly with 48.16%.
• For first serve return points, Parisca again holds an edge with 33.92% compared to Nijboer’s 29.71%.
• Under pressure, Nijboer shows a marginally better breakpoint save rate of 50.91% compared to Parisca's 50.68%.
• In the past year, Nijboer has won 56.18% of his matches, a bit higher than Parisca's 55.93%, indicating a tighter overall win rate.
• On hard surfaces, Nijboer exhibits his best performance with a win rate of 59%, while Parisca struggles immensely, having never won a match on hard.
• Parisca excels on clay, winning 59% of his matches, which could indicate a surface-specific advantage under certain conditions.
• Nijboer has been more successful in Futures/ITF tournaments with a win rate of 66.67%, whereas Parisca trails with 55.93%.
• In their only head-to-head encounter, Nijboer emerged victorious, suggesting a psychological advantage.
• When facing opponents, Nijboer competes against higher-ranked players, averaging 228.85, in contrast to Parisca's average opponent rank of 293.71.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Parisca has a better win rate of 47%, compared to Nijboer's 36%.

Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):

As Ryan Nijboer and Ignacio Parisca prepare to face off again, both players exhibit competitive traits with nearly comparable match win rates over the past year. However, the intricacies of their recent performances and specific abilities might tip the scales.

Parisca demonstrates a marginally better performance on second serves and returns, which could grant him an upper hand in maintaining service games and pressuring Nijboer's serves. Nonetheless, with better success at higher-level tournaments, Nijboer's experience against more skilled competitors might play a pivotal role.

Moreover, Nijboer's ideal surface is hard, where Parisca lacks victories, potentially giving Nijboer an edge on such a surface. However, should the match advance to a deciding set, Parisca seems to have better resilience in clinching the win.

Given the previous head-to-head outcome favoring Nijboer and his advantage in overall match play and surface preference, he is the likely candidate to emerge victorious in the upcoming match, should it play out on a hard surface.